| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 5:29 am    Post subject: Collection May 27, 2012 |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Lots of possiblities 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *-----------*
 |..8|...|2..|
 |9..|...|..7|
 |2.7|...|.93|
 |---+---+---|
 |4..|.9.|..6|
 |...|.2.|...|
 |...|..3|1.5|
 |---+---+---|
 |...|..8|...|
 |.5.|43.|...|
 |.6.|..7|.84|
 *-----------*
 
 | 
 Play/Print online
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:03 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| After basics:  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+-------------+-------------+ | 5   34  8   | 39  7   49  | 2   6   1   |
 | 9   13  6   | 23  48  12  | 48  5   7   |
 | 2   14  7   | 18 *56 *56  | 48  9   3   |
 +-------------+-------------+-------------+
 | 4   28  35  | 18  9   15  | 7   23  6   |
 | 1   7   35  |*56  2  *456 | 9   34  8   |
 | 6   289 29  | 7   48  3   | 1   24  5   |
 +-------------+-------------+-------------+
 | 7   29  4   |*56 *56  8   | 3   1   29  |
 | 8   5   1   | 4   3   29  | 6   7   29  |
 | 3   6   29  | 29  1   7   | 5   8   4   |
 +-------------+-------------+-------------+
 | 
 Deadly pattern 56:  R5C6 = 4.
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 4:31 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| BUG+2. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:35 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Same as Keith only different name. 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *--------------------------------------------------*
 | 5    34   8    | 39   7    49   | 2    6    1    |
 | 9    13   6    | 23   48   12   | 48   5    7    |
 | 2    14   7    | 18  *56  *56   | 48   9    3    |
 |----------------+----------------+----------------|
 | 4    28   35   | 18   9    15   | 7    23   6    |
 | 1    7    35   |*56   2   *4-56 | 9    34   8    |
 | 6    289  29   | 7    48   3    | 1    24   5    |
 |----------------+----------------+----------------|
 | 7    29   4    |*56  *56   8    | 3    1    29   |
 | 8    5    1    | 4    3    29   | 6    7    29   |
 | 3    6    29   | 29   1    7    | 5    8    4    |
 *--------------------------------------------------*
 remote pair
 (5=6)r5c4-(6=5)r4c4-(5=6)r4c5-(6=5)r3c5-(5=6)r3c6 => r5c6<>56; stte
 
 | 
 Play/Print online
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:10 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 Marty,
 
 I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 What was your technique?
 
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:30 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | tlanglet wrote: |  	  | 
 Marty,
 
 I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 What was your technique?
 
 Ted
 | 
 Ted,
 
 I play all my BUG+2s via pincers. In this case the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:34 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  | the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2. | 
 
 Is this correct?
 
 BUG+2:(2)r6c2=(5)r5c6-(5=1)r4c6-(1=8)r4c4-(8=2)r4c2 => r7c2<>2
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:48 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| [quote="arkietech"]  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  | the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<2> r7c2<>2 | 
 
 Dan,
 
 I'm not very Eureka-literate, but the cells in your notation are the cells I used to determine that 5 in r5c6 proves r4c2=2.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 10:01 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  |  	  | tlanglet wrote: |  	  | 
 Marty,
 
 I also played with the BUG+2and made some deletions, but could not find a one step solution.
 
 What was your technique?
 
 Ted
 | 
 Ted,
 
 I play all my BUG+2s via pincers. In this case the possibilities are 5 in r5c6 and 2 in r6c2. The 5 proves r4c2=2; r7c2<>2.
 | 
 
 Marty, Your path is as simple as they come. I do not have the details of my endeavor, but I obviously messed the straight forward solution.
 
 Good Move
   
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |