| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 3:18 pm    Post subject: Free Press Oct 1, 2010 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Not yet started ...
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
Puzzle: FP100110
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | 4 6 . | 5 3 . |
 
| . 2 . | 5 . . | . . . |
 
| 3 7 . | . . . | . . . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | . . . | 1 . . |
 
| 1 . . | 2 . 5 | . . 4 |
 
| . . 8 | 7 . . | . . . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | . . . | . 7 8 |
 
| . . . | . . 2 | . . . |
 
| . 4 7 | . 5 3 | 2 1 . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I'm throwing in the towel.    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:44 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I am going to perform basics again, but here is my first result
 
 
 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | xy-wing 36-9 vertex (36)r7c7 and pseudocell (39)box7; r8c79,r9c1<>9 | 	  
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:49 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Here's where I'm stuck. If you could explain the pseudo cell, I'd appreciate it.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 89    189   19   | 4   6   7   | 5    3    2    |
 
| 46    2     46   | 5   3   1   | 8    9    7    |
 
| 3     7     5    | 9   2   8   | 46   46   1    |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 7     569   2469 | 3   489 469 | 1    2568 569  |
 
| 1     369   369  | 2   89  5   | 7    68   4    |
 
| 24569 569   8    | 7   1   469 | 369  256  3569 |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 256   1356  1236 | 16  49  49  | 36   7    8    |
 
| 689   13689 1369 | 168 7   2   | 3469 456  3569 |
 
| 689   4     7    | 68  5   3   | 2    1    69   |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:02 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  Here's where I'm stuck. If you could explain the pseudo cell, I'd appreciate it.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 89    189   19   | 4   6   7   | 5    3    2    |
 
| 46    2     46   | 5   3   1   | 8    9    7    |
 
| 3     7     5    | 9   2   8   | 46   46   1    |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 7     569   2469 | 3   489 469 | 1    2568 569  |
 
| 1     369   369  | 2   89  5   | 7    68   4    |
 
| 24569 569   8    | 7   1   469 | 369  256  3569 |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
| 256   1356  1236 | 16  49  49  | 36   7    8    |
 
| 689   13689 1369 | 168 7   2   | 3469 456  3569 |
 
| 689   4     7    | 68  5   3   | 2    1    69   |
 
+------------------+-------------+----------------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site | 	  
 
 
Marty,
 
 
Happy to help........
 
 
First, you did not finish basics. Column 1 has a triple (689)r189c1 which opens still more basics.
 
 
Here is my code after basics,
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 89    18    19    | 4     6     7     | 5     3     2     |
 
 | 4     2     6     | 5     3     1     | 8     9     7     |
 
 | 3     7     5     | 9     2     8     | 46    46    1     |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 7     59    4     | 3     8     6     | 1     2     59    |
 
 | 1     6     3     | 2     9     5     | 7     8     4     |
 
 | 2     59    8     | 7     1     4     | 369   56    3569  |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 5     13    2     | 16    4     9     | 36    7     8     |
 
 | 689   138   19    | 168   7     2     | 3469  456   3569  |
 
 | 689   4     7     | 68    5     3     | 2     1     69    |
 
 *-----------------------------------------------------------* | 	  
 
I learned the term xy-wing with  pseudocell pincer from Keith. Simply stated, it is two (or more?) cells that form a chain and act as a single cell pincer.
 
 
Looking at my code, notice the potential xy-wing with vertex (36)r7c7, and pincer (69)r9c9. What we need is another pincer (39) to complete the xy-wing. Now look at the (13)r7c2 and the (19)r8c3. So, if r7c7=6 then r9c9=9 and if r7c7=3 then r7c2=1 and r8c3<>1=9. Thus the combination (13)r7c2 and (19)r8c3 form a pseudocell and acts as a pincer for the xy-wing.  Most of the longer chains I find are extensions of the vertex of a potential xy-wing in this manner until I find a cell with the matching pincer.
 
 
Of course, this could be simply described as a four cell xy chain: (9=6)r9c9-(6=3)r7c7-(3=1)r7c2-(1=9)r8c3; r8c79,r9c1<>9.
 
 
 
Hope this helps....
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:40 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Really?
 
 
I had no real problem with this one.
 
 
After basics:
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 89   18   19   | 4    6    7    | 5    3    2    | 
 
| 4    2    6    | 5    3    1    | 8    9    7    | 
 
| 3    7    5    | 9    2    8    | 46   46   1    | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 7    59   4    | 3    8    6    | 1    2    59   | 
 
| 1    6    3    | 2    9    5    | 7    8    4    | 
 
| 2    59   8    | 7    1    4    | 369  56   3569 | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 5    13   2    | 16   4    9    | 36   7    8    | 
 
| 689  138  19   | 168  7    2    | 3469 456  3569 | 
 
| 689  4    7    | 68   5    3    | 2    1    69   | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | 	  
 
 
XY-wing 5-69 in B69 solves the puzzle.
 
 
(It was not that easy, the basics were tough.)
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:46 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks Ted. I need to get my act together on basics.   I don't think I'd ever figure out a pseudo cell except on a UR. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:08 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It was pretty easy once I played the c1 689 triple that Ted pointed out I missed.
 
 
I saw the XY-Wing on 596 but I played the Type 1 UR on 59 first. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:23 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Marty,
 
 
Their is a 24 pair in B4 that I spotted early on.  That avoids the triple in C1.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:50 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | keith wrote: | 	 		  Marty,
 
 
Their is a 24 pair in B4 that I spotted early on.  That avoids the triple in C1.
 
 
Keith | 	  
 
Of course, I would call that a 3569 quad rather than a 24 pair. But I have been missing basics lately and that has caused me problems.
 
 
Creeping (galloping?) senility. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:14 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Marty,
 
 
I found it before I started pencil marks.
 
 
I do this scanning thing with each block - look at the solved cells outside the block, that are not solved inside the block.  In this case, I found the 24 pair in B4 by noticing the solved 2 and 4 in each of R5 and C2.
 
 
(For B4, look at solved cells outside B4 in R456 and C123.)
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |