| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		peterj
 
 
  Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:15 pm    Post subject: Krampus Edition - "?" #2 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		   *-----------*
 
 |..7|361|...|
 
 |..2|8..|..1|
 
 |6.5|...|...|
 
 |---+---+---|
 
 |.8.|.25|...|
 
 |.7.|...|.2.|
 
 |...|73.|.9.|
 
 |---+---+---|
 
 |...|...|5.4|
 
 |3..|..7|2..|
 
 |...|298|6..|
 
 *-----------* | 	 
  	  | Code: | 	 		  | 007361000002800001605000000080025000070000020000730090000000504300007200000298600 | 	  
 
(c) Helmut Saueregger | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:19 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------------+--------------+----------------+
 
| 8       49   7       | 3    6  1    | 49    5    2   |
 
| -9(4)   3    2       | 8    5  9(4) | 7     6    1   |
 
| 6       1    5       | 49   7  2    | 3489  34   38  |
 
+----------------------+--------------+----------------+
 
| 14(9)   8    14(369) | 149  2  5    | 134   347  367 |
 
| 145(9)  7    14(369) | 149  8  469  | 134   2    356 |
 
| 1245    245  14(6)   | 7    3  (46) | 148   9    568 |
 
+----------------------+--------------+----------------+
 
| 279     29   89      | 6    1  3    | 5     78   4   |
 
| 3       6    18      | 5    4  7    | 2     18   9   |
 
| 1457    45   14      | 2    9  8    | 6     137  37  |
 
+----------------------+--------------+----------------+ | 	  
 
 
one step
 
(9)R45C1 = (39-6)R45C3 = (6)R6C3 - (6=4)R6C6 - (4)R2C6 = (4)R2C1; R2C1 <> 9 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:11 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One step AIC: (3=7)r9c9-r9c1=(7-2)r7c1=(2-9)r7c2=r1c2-(9=4)r1c7-(4=3)r3c8; r3c9,r9c8<>3
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:31 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				There are several reasonable ways to crack this puzzle in one step. I decided to take the unreasonable approach. First, I tried my best to find a DP containing <49+?>, but I failed. Then, I happened to examine just <9>.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   Kraken Skyscraper r24c1 on <9>  =>  r5c6<>9
 
 
 now comes the Kraken network
 
 
 ( r4c3=9 r5c3=3 ) r6c3=6 r6c6=4 r2c6=9  =>  r5c6<>9
 
 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 |  8      49     7      |  3      6      1      |  49     5      2      |
 
 | *49     3      2      |  8      5     *49     |  7      6      1      |
 
 |  6      1      5      |  49     7      2      |  3489   34     38     |
 
 |-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
 
 | *149    8     #13469  | *149    2      5      |  134    347    367    |
 
 |  1459   7      13469  |  149    8      46-9   |  134    2      356    |
 
 |  1245   245    146    |  7      3      46     |  148    9      568    |
 
 |-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
 
 |  279    29     89     |  6      1      3      |  5      78     4      |
 
 |  3      6      18     |  5      4      7      |  2      18     9      |
 
 |  1457   45     14     |  2      9      8      |  6      137    37     |
 
 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 # 66 eliminations remain
 
 | 	  
 
Regards, Danny
 
 
An alternate perspective based on a forcing chain:
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
(6)r6c3 - (6=4)r6c6 -                         (4=9)r2c6  =>  r5c6<>9
 
 
(6)r6c3 = hp(36-149)r45c3 = (9)r45c1 - r2c1 = (  9)r2c6  =>  r5c6<>9
 
 | 	 
 
  Last edited by daj95376 on Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		peterj
 
 
  Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:37 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Danny, yep - unreasonable!
 
But I think a Kraken move starting with an almost-turbot move or a broken wing is an underused play - and no more unreasonable than starting with a DP IMHO. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:51 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Peter, in case you missed my alterate perspective ... look up ^^^^^.
 
 
It's even more unrealistic than my Kraken Skyscraper. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:37 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | daj95376 wrote: | 	 		  There are several reasonable ways to crack this puzzle in one step. I decided to take the unreasonable approach. First, I tried my best to find a DP containing <49>, but I failed. Then, I happened to examine just <9>.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   Kraken Skyscraper r24c1 on <9>  =>  r5c6<9>  r5c6<9>  r5c6<9>  r5c6<>9
 
 | 	 
  | 	  
 
 
Danny,
 
 
I love your Kraken skyscraper          
 
 
I don't really care what they are called: almost, finned, Kraken etc... but working with variations on standard patterns is one of my greatest pleasures in playing sudoku. In this case you found a chain that was not obvious but it did the job in short order. Great and rewarding!
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |