| 
 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic |  
		| Author | Message |  
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:26 pm    Post subject: DB Saturday Puzzle: 12 May, 2007 |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I haven't posted one of these for a while.  Because they have required chains.  I found this one relatively easy. 
  	  | Code: |  	  | Puzzle: DB051207 ****** +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 3 1 | . . . | . . 8 |
 | . . 9 | . 8 1 | 6 3 . |
 | . . 8 | 2 5 . | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | 3 . . | . 4 . |
 | 8 . 3 | . . . | 5 . 2 |
 | . 9 . | . . 8 | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | . 7 6 | 9 . . |
 | . 6 7 | 9 2 . | 3 . . |
 | 9 . . | . . . | 2 7 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 
 Enjoy!
 
 Keith
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Steve R 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Oct 2005
 Posts: 289
 Location: Birmingham, England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Thanks for the puzzle, Keith. 
 I paused at this point:
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +----------------------+
 ¦ 5 3 1 ¦ . . . ¦ . 2 8 ¦
 ¦ . . 9 ¦ . 8 1 ¦ 6 3 5 ¦
 ¦ 6 . 8 ¦ 2 5 3 ¦ . . . ¦
 ------------------------
 ¦ . 5 6 ¦ 3 . 2 ¦ 8 4 . ¦
 ¦ 8 . 3 ¦ . . . ¦ 5 . 2 ¦
 ¦ . 9 . ¦ 5 . 8 ¦ . . 3 ¦
 ------------------------
 ¦ 3 . . ¦ . 7 6 ¦ 9 5 . ¦
 ¦ . 6 7 ¦ 9 2 5 ¦ 3 8 . ¦
 ¦ 9 . 5 ¦ . 3 4 ¦ 2 7 6 ¦
 +----------------------+
 | 
 The missing candidates in box 7 and row 9 are (18) so 8 can be eliminated from r7c2 if you are prepared to assume there is a unique solution. This places 8 in r9c2 and solves the puzzle.
 
 Some other pairs are almost as obvious:
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------------------+
 ¦  5  3  1 ¦ . . . ¦ . 2 8 ¦
 ¦  .  .  9 ¦ . 8 1 ¦ 6 3 5 ¦
 ¦  6  .  8 ¦ 2 5 3 ¦ . . . ¦
 ---------------------------
 ¦  .  5  6 ¦ 3 . 2 ¦ 8 4 . ¦
 ¦  8 14  3 ¦ . . . ¦ 5 . 2 ¦
 ¦  .  9 24 ¦ 5 . 8 ¦ . . 3 ¦
 ---------------------------
 ¦  3  . 24 ¦ . 7 6 ¦ 9 5 . ¦
 ¦ 14  6  7 ¦ 9 2 5 ¦ 3 8 . ¦
 ¦  9  .  5 ¦ . 3 4 ¦ 2 7 6 ¦
 +-------------------------+
 | 
 The sequence (14) – (24) – (24) –(14) is not properly speaking an example of remote pairs but it is just as easy to spot and has exactly the same effect: 1 may be eliminated from any common associate of r5c2 and r8c1. Here the result is again to place 8 in r9c2.
 
 This is indeed a chain. Still, if other DB chains are as straightforward as this, I for one should be keen to see a few more examples. Thanks again.
 
 Steve
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| David 
 
 
 Joined: 02 Jun 2006
 Posts: 58
 Location: Bedford, UK
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:02 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| How about using the type 4 UR at r7c2,4 and r9c2,4 ? |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Steve R 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Oct 2005
 Posts: 289
 Location: Birmingham, England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Is it type 4? 
 As explained immediately below the first grid in my post I simply eliminated 1 and 8 from r7c2 on the grounds that (18) were the only candidates for the other three corners of the UR.
 
 I thought this was type one. However I’m not good on type numbers. Also, as this move reduced the puzzle to singles, I did not look further. Perhaps you have something different in mind.
 
 Steve
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:14 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I agree with Keith that this one was easy. I also recall a Type 1 rectangle on 18 that was all that was needed to finish it off. |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 |  
 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
 
 |