| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| PeteGrant 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Feb 2006
 Posts: 10
 Location: Saranac Lake, New York
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:57 am    Post subject: Feb 17 Medium??? Puzzle |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I solve about 50% of hard puzzles and usually do medium ones in 20 minutes or less, but this one has me stumped.  So far, I have 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | 2 3 1    _ _ _    9 7 6
 4 _ _    3 _ 7    _ _ _
 8 7 _    2 _ _    4 _ _
 
 3 5 _    7 _ _    _ _ _
 7 8 2    _ 3 _    5 9 _
 1 _ _    _ _ 2    _ 3 7
 
 9 _ 7    _ _ 4    3 _ _
 5 _ 3    8 _ 9    7 _ _
 6 _ 8    _ 7 3    2 _ 9
 
 
 | 
 The Draw gives a hint to place a 9 in r6c2 but I can't see the logic behind that move.  Can anyone clue me in on what I'm missing?
 
 TIA
 
 Pete
 ________
 Volvo B30 engine picture
 
 Last edited by PeteGrant on Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:05 am; edited 1 time in total
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| geoff h 
 
 
 Joined: 07 Aug 2005
 Posts: 58
 Location: Sydney
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:17 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Hi Pete, 
 Your problem may be that you have not copied the puzzle correctly. Today's puzzle has a 3 in r3c9 which you do not have.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Cheers,
 Geoff.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Steve R 
 
 
 Joined: 24 Oct 2005
 Posts: 289
 Location: Birmingham, England
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:50 pm    Post subject: Feb 17 Medium Puzzle |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Pete 
 Geoff is right about the 3 but I am following up his note because I am not sure if this will help you very much. I think the logic behind the 9s is:
 
 The 9 in box 2 (the upper middle box) is not in the first row so it must occupy column 5. As a result the 9 in the central box has to be placed in column 4 and the only position available in that column is r6c4.
 
 Steve
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Guest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:39 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| The 9 in 3:3 leaves the 9 in 6:2 your only choice. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| David Bryant 
 
 
 Joined: 29 Jul 2005
 Posts: 559
 Location: Denver, Colorado
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:03 pm    Post subject: Did you copy it to "Draw" correctly? |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | PeteGrant wrote: |  	  | The Draw gives a hint to place a 9 in r6c2 but I can't see the logic behind that move. Can anyone clue me in on what I'm missing? | 
 Hi, Pete!
 
 Are you sure you keyed it in to the Draw program correctly? The reason I'm asking is that a "9" at r6c2 is clearly impossible, from the position you entered.
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | 2 3 1    _ _ _    9 7 6 4 _ _    3 _ 7    _ _ _
 8 7 _    2 _ _    4 _ 3
 
 3 5 _    7 _ _    _ _ _
 7 8 2    _ 3 _    5 9 _
 1 _ _    _ _ 2    _ 3 7
 
 9 _ 7    _ _ 4    3 _ _
 5 _ 3    8 _ 9    7 _ _
 6 _ 8    _ 7 3    2 _ 9
 | 
 Looking at column 4 it's clear there must be a "9" at r6c4. There's already a "9" in the bottom center 3x3 box, and there are "9"s in rows 1 & 5, so r6c4 is the only place a "9" can fit in that column. And once that "9" is entered at r6c4 the only way to fit a "9" in column 2 is at r2c2.
 
 I think you didn't enter the puzzle into Draw correctly, or it wouldn't have given that hint.  dcb
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| alanr555 
 
 
 Joined: 01 Aug 2005
 Posts: 198
 Location: Bideford Devon EX39
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:34 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Code: |  	  | As a Medium puzzle, this one was solvable without any pencil
 marks in the grid. However, I did find that marking "Missing"
 profiles outside the grid for most of the rows and columns did
 assist with the solution.
 
 Sometimes the solution depends upon "Sole Position" or just
 "Sole Candidate" and having the "Missing" profiles for each
 row or column assists by not having to work out what is missing
 each time that one considers a row or column.
 
 This is useful for the technique of comparing the string of "Missing"
 digits for a row with the contents of the intersecting column for
 any blank cell in the row - and vice versa of course, If this reduces
 the possibilities to two or three then a quick scan of the related
 region will determine if a further reduction to just one value is possible.
 
 I have no note of any reduction to congruent subsets for any row or
 column and so just general logic seems to have been adequate.
 
 Alan Rayner  BS23 2QT
 
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |